Vietnam asks Korea to scrap its 15,000-tonne shrimp quota
Vietnam's shrimp industry has asked its government to put the removal of South Korea's shrimp tariff quota on the table when the two countries renegotiate their free trade agreement. The request, filed by the Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers in official letter 222/CV-VASEP, argues that the quota now costs importers more than the duty it was designed to avoid.
The mechanism is unusual enough to matter outside Vietnam. Korea admits 15,000 tonnes of Vietnamese shrimp a year at a zero tariff rate. The right to use that allowance is allocated by auction, and Vietnamese exporters say the winning bids add roughly 14% to 16% of import value in cost. Shrimp arriving outside the quota pays 20%.
The Numbers
The gap between those two numbers is narrower than it looks. A quota-covered kilo carries a 14-16% access charge; a non-quota kilo carries a 20% duty. Importers paying near the top of the bidding range buy a discount of four to six points, and must commit volume in advance to get it.
Korea imports more than 100,000 tonnes of shrimp a year, valued at USD 800 million to 1 billion, according to the association. Vietnamese product holds close to 50% of that volume. Vietnam's seafood exports to Korea reached USD 649.1 million in the first nine months of 2026, split mainly between shrimp at USD 262.5 million and cephalopods at USD 234 million, as Tuoi Tre reported on 11 November.
The broader shrimp book is slowing. Vietnam exported USD 3.7 billion of shrimp in the first nine months of 2026, up 11% year on year, with China alone near USD 1.2 billion for a 37% gain and a third of total value. VnEconomy reported that buyer interest at the association's Can Tho summit in November centred on tariffs and trade defence rather than demand growth.
The association's argument is that the quota has stopped functioning as a preference. When the access cost approaches the out-of-quota duty, Korean buyers lose the incentive to commit to Vietnamese supply, and the letter states that some are already reviewing purchases from Peru and other origins.
What It Means for Buyers
Treat the quota as a cost line, not a tariff line. For a Korean importer, the effective protection on a container of Vietnamese PDTO depends on what the auction cleared at, which means landed cost moves with an allocation mechanism rather than with the HS code.
That creates a structural opening for non-Vietnamese origin in Korea. Any supplier outside the quota system competes against a 20% out-of-quota rate and a 14-16% bid cost, which is a wide band to work with on commodity sizes. Vannamei from Ecuador, India or China can be priced into that gap without matching Vietnam on processing quality.
Watch the product mix as well. Vietnam's 50% share of Korean volume is concentrated in processed and value-added specs, the segment where Korean buyers pay for peeling, grading and glaze control rather than for raw count. If quota economics push those buyers to test alternative origins on standard PD and PDTO, the processing premium is what gets negotiated down first.
If the quota is abolished, the arithmetic flips. Zero duty without volume limit would remove both the 20% ceiling and the bidding cost, and Vietnamese offers into Korea would reset lower across the board. That is a pricing event worth having a position on before it happens, not after.
The counter-argument is political: the auction raises revenue and protects Korean distributors, so removal will be traded against something else in the VKFTA upgrade. Exporters should not assume the request is granted on this cycle.
What to Watch
Whether Vietnam's trade ministry puts shrimp quotas into the formal VKFTA upgrade agenda, which would turn a trade association request into a negotiating item.
Korean auction results for 2027 quota tranches, the cleanest read on whether access costs are rising or easing.
Korean import volumes by origin for the fourth quarter, which would show whether buyers are already testing Peru and Ecuador.
Vietnam's shrimp growth rate into 2027, given the slowdown from 11% and the concentration of gains in China.
Related Products
This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI and is published for general information only. It does not constitute trading, pricing, or investment advice, and readers should verify all figures against the original sources linked above before making commercial decisions. Content on this page is partly AI-generated. Easy Seafood makes no warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.
Comments